Chapter 16 - The Choice Victoria Made|

Victoria did not deny signing the shipping authorization.
When Rebecca arranged a meeting with her attorney, my aunt arrived carrying a folder of her own.
"I signed it," she said before anyone asked. "But I did not know the necklace was Caroline's property in the legal sense."
I stared at her.
"You knew it belonged to my family."
"Yes."
"You knew I had never authorized its transfer."
"I believed Preston had obtained your approval."
"Did you ask me?"
"No."
The admission hung between us.
Victoria looked down.
"I was wrong."
It was not enough, but it was a beginning.
Her attorney explained that Victoria had signed the authorization after Preston told her the necklace was being transferred temporarily for an insurance review. She had received no payment for the signature, according to the records she provided, though that claim would need to be independently verified.
The document had later been used in the chain of paperwork associated with the necklace's sale.
Victoria agreed to provide a formal statement and cooperate with the investigation.
After the meeting, I asked her to walk with me outside.
We stood beneath the bare branches of a small park tree while taxis moved along the avenue.
"Why did you trust him more than you trusted me?" I asked.
She closed her eyes.
"I thought I was protecting you from financial trouble."
"By keeping me ignorant of my own affairs?"
"I know how it sounds."
"It sounds like you decided I was too fragile to know the truth."
Victoria nodded slowly.
"Your father had always handled the complicated parts. After he died, I was afraid of making the wrong decisions. Preston seemed confident. He said he could manage the situation."
"And you let him."
"Yes."
I looked at her.
"Did you ever suspect he was using my name without my permission?"
"I suspected he was keeping information from me. I didn't understand how much."
"Why didn't you investigate?"
"Because I was afraid that if I asked too many questions, the family would lose everything."
I thought of my grandmother's letter.
Choose the truth.
"You don't protect a family by hiding the truth from it," I said.
Victoria began to cry.
"I know that now."
I didn't embrace her.
I wasn't ready.
But I agreed that she could continue cooperating through her attorney, and I told her that any genuine effort to repair the damage would have to begin with complete honesty.
The investigation accelerated after her statement.
The broker confirmed that the emerald choker and most of the other pieces remained secured. The missing necklace was located with Adrian Cole, who agreed to surrender it temporarily under a formal preservation arrangement while the ownership dispute was resolved.
The jewelry itself was no longer the central mystery.
The money was.
The forensic accountant traced several transfers through Hartwell Strategic Holdings and related entities. The records showed inconsistencies between the stated purposes of certain payments and the supporting documentation.
The accountant could not yet determine the ultimate destination of every dollar, but the findings were serious enough to justify further investigation.
Rebecca informed me that the disputed authorization bearing my signature might have been assembled from several genuine documents.
Someone had taken a legitimate signature page, combined it with different transaction details, and presented the result as a complete authorization.
The evidence suggested that the document had been altered, but the final determination would require examination of the original files and the bank's records.
Preston's attorney contacted Rebecca with an offer.
Preston would return the remaining jewelry, pay for any verified losses, and cooperate with a private settlement if I agreed not to pursue further claims relating to the financial transactions.
Rebecca advised me to consider the offer only in consultation with counsel and not to sign away rights before the facts were established.
I rejected it.
Not because I wanted revenge.
Because the offer asked me to exchange the truth for compensation.
That evening, Preston called.
"You've made your point," he said.
"No, Preston. I've documented it."
"You don't understand how many people could be hurt."
"I understand that people have already been hurt."
"I can make this right."
"Then start by telling the investigators who altered the authorization."
Silence.
Then his voice turned cold.
"If you continue, you may discover things about your father that you won't be able to live with."
I felt the old instinct to defend my family.
Then I remembered my grandmother's letter.
"Whatever the records show about my father, I want to know."
Preston hung up.
An hour later, Rebecca received a message from his attorney.
Preston was prepared to identify the person who had altered the disputed authorization.
But he would do so only if he received immunity from civil claims.
Rebecca rejected the condition.
Then she read the final sentence aloud.
"He says Charles Wexler was responsible for the alteration."
I stared at the wall.
Wexler had been connected to the records for years.
May you like
But if he had altered the document, why had Preston agreed to handle me?
And why was Preston suddenly willing to blame him?